Splunk join 2 searches7/22/2023 With SAML if you're using Asana Enterprise.Using your Google account if you're using Asana Premium, Business, or Enterprise. ![]() By entering an email address and creating a new password, unique to Asana.To create an account for yourself, visit and select Get Started You can join, create, or leave any number of organizations or workspaces from a single account, as illustrated above. You do not need to maintain multiple accounts. If you sign up with your work email and there is an existing organization set up under this corporate domain, you can then request to join the teams within the organization. Use your work email if you want to belong to your company's Asana organization. You can add other email addresses to your account later. We'll ask for your name and email address when you sign up. You can sign up for Asana yourself, or you can accept an invitation to join. Learn more about the permission settings of your projects and tasks within each of your workspaces & organizations here. Learn more about privacy between these spaces here. Since each workspace and organization are their own separate entities, your colleagues cannot see the other spaces you belong to, nor can you see the other spaces your colleagues may belong to. Having connection issues? You may find this article helpful instead. The spaces you belong to are their own separate entities, each with their own unique set of people, projects, and tasks. With a single Asana account, you can create or join multiple workspaces and organizations to collaborate with various groups of Asana users. Asana accounts grant access to shared workspaces and organizations to enable collaboration with other Asana users. Or, you know, adding a non-loadjob multiple base search capability.Asana accounts are free and are tied to individual users. the fact that Splunk is a billion-dollar company that cannot put BUTTONS (or single-value checkboxes, mostly) on its SimpleXML dashboards. Why don't you just remove the capability if you don't want people to use it.? I think Splunk would be better suited to, instead of taking the money I pay and using it to police my downvoting, to use that money to fix issues, e.g. Just trying to contribute to the community. Honestly, SA downvoting is so ridiculously policed and also inconsistent with the entire internet. Since downvoting doesn't actually remove the answer, the net positive of downvoting is more robust communal knowledge, and the net positive of not downvoting is, well, zero. Otherwise people like me see the answer, assume it's accurate, and stop exploring avenues to fixing the problem because they've been told they can't fix it. ![]() It's not a slight to the person who posted it (isn't this how all internet forums work? a downvote isn't necessarily a personal slight? it's for the accuracy of communal knowledge?). ![]() I think downvoting solutions that say "sorry, you can't solve this problem" when they are no longer correct is extremely helpful to the community. ![]() And yes tangentially, the question literally says " multiple base searches" in the title. However, in this case the answer was not "here's an answer that works for version X" or "you can't do this in version X and below" (in which case downvoting would have been incorrect) but the answer was "there is not a solution to this problem (and here's a tangentially related workaround)", which is now wholly incorrect no matter what logical framework you use. I mean, I agree, you should not downvote an answer that works for some versions but not for others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |